Re: EOCred: Important: progress and the beginning of the end

Phil, very nice, complete summary. I do have some comments on the 6 issues
arising from proposals. What's the least confusing way to handle
comment/discussion on these issues. I know you've created a wiki page for
them but wonder whether 6 separate threads here on the list might be the
best way to respond as opposed to clogging up the wiki page.

Issue 1: whether EducationalOccupationalCredential is a subtype of
CreativeWork or Intangible.

Issue 2: [desired/required competencies] only addresses the simplest case
of individual required competencies.

Issue 3: whether accreditation is a form of recognition.

Issue 4: the actual renewal / maintenance requirements aren’t specified.

Issue 5: there is no way represent Assessments in schema.org

Issue 6: there is no explicit guidance on how to show required learning
materials for a Course in schema.org.


On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> If you have been waiting for a chance to engage with the general work of
> this group rather than the nitty gritty of individual use cases and
> property definitions, this would be a good time to do so.
>
> You may have seen that I posted a summary of our progress
> <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/2018/05/23/progress-so-far-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/>
> so far, and pointers to what we need to do to complete the work [1]. The
> pointers to what we need to to complete the work are also summarized
> <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals>
> on the wiki [2].
>
> *Actions:* (please)
>
> 1. Check the progress
> <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/2018/05/23/progress-so-far-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/>,
> raise any issues you think I may have missed; i.e. let me know if you are
> not happy about how a use case has been addressed.
>
> 2. Check the issues
> <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_arising_from_proposals>.
> I propose that all the use cases that remain unaddressed be deferred for
> future contributions to schema.org; I also propose that issues 2 - 6 be
> similarly deferred. Issue 1 probably requires some further conversation.
>
> Let me know if anything needs clarifying. I know it is a fairly long
> summary, but still I didn't go into much detail by way of explanations.
>
> Best regards, Phil.
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/2018/05/23/
> progress-so-far-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/
>
> [2] https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Issues_
> arising_from_proposals
> --
>
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning;
> information systems for education.
> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for
> innovation in education technology.
>
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
> number SC569282.
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
> England number OC399090
>