- From: Vicki Tardif <vtardif@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:44:12 -0400
- To: Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>
- Cc: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>, public-eocred-schema@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAOr1obH9J6Xrff=n-Tr12p045Ayyyvcgrtdd9MbXe3eeq4UWWQ@mail.gmail.com>
In my mind, the difference is captured in the example at https://www.coursera.org/specializations/google-it-support As I understand it, the credential is issuedBy (whether future or past tense) Google, but is offeredBy Coursera. In other words, it is a Google certification, but the student pays Coursera. - Vicki On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com> wrote: > issuedBy vs. offeredBy > The terms themselves indicate a semantics to me that seems to indicate > that the issuedBy property appears on a credential already earned or > awarded, whereas offering is what is currently offered by a granting > institution. The University of Nottingham may stop offering a Ph.D in > Electrical Engineering. Earners of Ph.D's have an issuedby property, where > as an aggregation of current offerings of Ph.Ds in Electrical Engineering > would not include The University of Nottingham. > > Am I missing the point of the question at hand? > - Hugh > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> > wrote: > >> I think it depends on whether the distinction between offering and >> issuing is going to be important. >> >> For example a credential might be offered by several organizations and it >> might be important to know which of those had issued a specific instance. >> That's a bit hypothetical, I have no strong feel for how often such a >> distinction would matter in practice (or even if it really happens). >> >> issuedBy also has the merit of being simpler, more direct. >> >> Phil >> >> On 26/03/18 16:29, Vicki Tardif wrote: >> >> I think using "offers" works for the use case of understanding which >> organizations offer a particular credential, but does this work as well for >> the eventual use case of "Person X earned Credential Y from Organization >> Z"? >> >> If "issuedBy" works better for the latter, maybe we should also use it >> for this use case. >> >> - Vicki >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Looking through the use cases >>> <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Use_Cases#Name_search_for_credentialing_organization> >>> for Educational Occupational Credentials in schema.org, I see we have >>> one for >>> >>> Name search for credentialing organization >>> >>> It should be possible to search and find credentials by the name of the >>> credentialing organization. >>> *Requires:* ability to show relationship between educational / >>> occupational credential objects and descriptions or representations of >>> credentialling organization >>> >>> Also, >>> >>> Find credentialing organization[edit >>> <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/index.php?title=Use_Cases&action=edit§ion=26> >>> ] >>> >>> Having identified a credential, it should be possible to find the >>> credentialing organization. >>> >>> I think we have already solved these back when we discussed cost of a >>> credential. We solved this in part by use of the the schema.org offers >>> property and Offer type. As I think Richard pointed out at the time, the >>> Offer type has a property 'offeredBy' so we can say: >>> >>> { >>> "@context": "http://schema.org/" <http://schema.org/>, >>> "@type": "EducationalOccupationalCredential", >>> "url" : "https://example.org/ecocred" <https://example.org/ecocred>, >>> "name": "Example", >>> "offers": { >>> "@type": "Offer", >>> "offeredBy" : { >>> "@type": "Organization", >>> "name": "Example org", >>> "url": "https://example.org/" <https://example.org/> >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> >>> The Example credential is offered by Example.org. >>> >>> Does anyone think this is not sufficient to meet the use case? >>> >>> An alternative is to co-opt the issuedBy <http://schema.org/issuedBy> >>> property from Permit <http://schema.org/Permit>. But one important >>> aspect of our work here is that we are dealing *primarily* with the >>> offer of a Credential, not a claim that someone has earned one. That is, >>> BadgeClass rather than Assertions if you appreciate a parallel with Open >>> Badges. So offeredBy seems the better fit to me. >>> There is a note in the use cases that "there may be several different >>> significant types of relationship between credentials and organizations". >>> We have a separate use case for quality assurance that would cover >>> accreditation, recognition etc., of the credentialing organization and >>> which we can discuss later. >>> >>> Regards, Phil >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil >>> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; >>> information systems for education. >>> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education >>> technology. >>> >>> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, >>> number SC569282. >>> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in >>> England number OC399090 >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil >> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; >> information systems for education. >> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education >> technology. >> >> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, >> number SC569282. >> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in >> England number OC399090 >> > >
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 18:44:37 UTC