Re: Help making an example combining eocred ideas with fact-checking markup?

Hello Dan
Not a use case we have considered, as it's related to a person having a 
credential rather than a credential being available. We would need to be 
able to say that the claim maker / fact checker had a credential, which 
is a use case that we ducked out of because of concerns over how to 
verify that they really did have the credential. Assuming that is fixed 
somehow, e.g. with a hasEOCred property and an out of band means of 
checking that assertion, here's my Friday evening best shot:

An EducationalOccupationalCredential, as a subtype of CreativeWork, can 
be said to be about something; so can the thing in which the claim is 
made, so:

{
   "@context":  "http://schema.org/",
   "@type": "Book",
   "about": "climate change"
   "author": {
     "@type": "Person",
     "name": "Jo Bloggs",
"hasEOCred": {
         "@type": "EducationalOccupationalCredential",
         "name": "PhD in Climatology",
         "credentialCategory": "Doctorate",
         "about": "Climatology",
         "recognizedBy": "University of Poppleton"
         "competencyRequired": "..."
     }
}

Of course the value for hasEOCred could be a link to data about the 
credential elsewhere, e.g. on the Univeristy website.

I've used recognizedBy to provide the name of the university that 
awarded the credential. We could instead say that it was/is Offered by 
them, but it seems reasonable and simpler to assume that the University 
would recognize their own credentials.

The limits on expressiveness are those of matching the subject of the 
credential / the competencies it recognizes to the subject of the work 
being fact checked.

Phil

On 22/06/18 17:29, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> Hi! Could folk here help sketch an example where we describe the 
> author of a Book, ScholarlyArticle, NewsArticle, Podcast or 
> fact-checkable Claim (c.f. http://schema.org/ClaimReview) using eocred 
> vocabularies and patterns.
>
> This largely pertains to fact-checking; perhaps describing the claim 
> maker, or perhaps, the fact checker.
>
>  What kinds of ways might eg "expertize in climate change" or 
> "vaccines" or "nuclear power station building and systems" be 
> indicated? what are the expressivity limits? what other idioms (eg 
> employment history)?
>
> I could share a guess but would love to see an independent take on this...
>
> Dan

-- 

Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; 
information systems for education.
CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for 
innovation in education technology.

PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, 
number SC569282.
CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in 
England number OC399090