- From: Nate Otto <nate@ottonomy.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:21:18 -0800
- To: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Cc: public-eocred-schema@w3.org
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 18:21:44 UTC
Phil wrote: > > I think we are close to consensus, and I think that consensus depends on > some level of precision. Also as Nate said level make most sense when > defined in relation to each other. Describing this level with reference to > something like SCQF makes sense to people, describing it with relation to a > vaguer term like "Bachelors degree" caused confusion. This seems like a > perfect match to DefinedTerm / DefinedTermSets. > Thanks for the insight on the evolution of AlignmentObject over time. I've got no objection to something like a DefinedTerm/DefinedTermSets approach.
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 18:21:44 UTC