- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:29:26 +0000
- To: public-eocred-schema@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4434d490-2f8c-f265-6835-dff6cd4c6062@pjjk.co.uk>
On 16/02/18 01:15, Nate Otto wrote: > Unless we can find consensus on what sense of the word "level" we're > trying to model, maybe we should just leave it out. There are many > cans of springs that could be opened. > > Phil, your draft phrase "Indicates the required level of educational > attainment, accomplishment, knowledge or experience" doesn't clearly > match any of the senses of level we've been talking about here. You > mentioned you had been thinking about the second sense I suggested > (the credential recognizes achievement of a particular level) and then > this draft text more closely represents the first (the credential > requires a certain level of experience or skill in order to > participate in or be likely to pass assessment). > My wording isn't great. I think there is some consensus that there are three distinct aspects as Fritz outlined: level of accomplishment, extent (amount of credit), ways of indicating how well an individual did. Sorry, I found it hard to distinguish the two senses you mentioned earlier: they seem like two different ways of using the same level of accomplishment, one to indicate what a course of study aims for, one to indicate what is expected before a credential is awarded. So perhaps I didn't understand your original question. While the focus of this group is on credentials, with a wider view I think that a property representing level could have Course, CreativeWorks (learning materials) and EducationalOccupationalCredential in its domain. Perhaps that didn't help clarity either. Talking about Associate Degree / Bachellors degrees etc as equating to levels is only half the story. It does make sense colloquially to talk about something as "degree level" or "PhD Level", but the actual credential category name comprises an indication of both this level and the scope or extent or breadth of coverage (roughly, the length of the course needed to cover the material / concepts / skills that need to be demonstrated). To formallize this, in Europe we have a well established, widely used (required by regulatory authorities) European Qualifications Framework defining levels, [EQF <https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/content/descriptors-page>, wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Qualifications_Framework>] and European Credit Transfer System [ECTS <https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources/european-credit-transfer-accumulation-system_en>, wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Credit_Transfer_and_Accumulation_System>] defining the extent of coverage. These are implemented as national frameworks that map to the EQF and ECTS, and I am most familiar with the Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework, SCQF <http://scqf.org.uk/>. So a Scottish Bachellors degree programme is 480 SCQF credits reaching SCQF level 10 (which maps to 240 ECTS credits reaching EQF level 6), the credential awarded is thus at EQF level 6. I cannot overemphasise how pervasive these concepts of level and credit are in formal education and training in Scotland, and the rest of Europe. In the US, I see the Connecting Credentials Framework <http://connectingcredentials.org/framework-detail/> (CCF) is defined in terms of levels which look very similar to the EQF levels. The problem I have, is that I don't see in CCF or EQF any short definition of what they mean by 'level' that would be useful for a schema.org property name and description. I would really welcome a focus on level as exemplified in EQF, SCQF, CCF: - do we have consensus that it is a useful distinct property? - is there a better name than educationalLevel? - how do we define it in one or two sentences? Phil -- Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 12:29:52 UTC