- From: Victoria Menezes Miller <menezesmiller@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:10:46 +0000
- To: "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
- Cc: "Wise, Charlotte" <cwise@visa.com>, "Charlotte H. Wise" <charlottehelenwise@gmail.com>, public-eo-plan@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAKOS2qbzjBkXeE62WOaRySghvKXvFdVOVE81cVNGCL6DxGRbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Brent, Many thanks for your detailed feedback. Will continue as advised, Best, Vicki On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com> wrote: > Hi Vicki and Charlotte, > > Thank you for providing the Editing Plan for the resource and the > additional questions. The planning team met this morning to discuss and > provide feedback. Sorry for the delay of the response. We had an email > listserve issue. Below is a bulleted list of the feedback and > recommendations that we would like you to add to you editing plan. > > *Feedback and recommendations to add to plan emailed below:* > > - > *Web Accessibility and Older People: Meeting the Needs of Ageing Web > Users * > - No changes to your approach/plan. Keep going with drafting up the > edits > - Recommend sending to the small review team when you have a final > draft. You can send them the Word doc with everything revised and changes > accepted. Then provide them with the link to the current page. Ask them to > review and open new issues in GitHub for you and Charlotte to act on. > - *Shawn *- will you create a GitHub repo for them to use for > issues please (if one does not already exist). > - Reviewers can provide feedback to you within Word doc as well if > you prefer. Use Track Changes for that. > - > *Older Users Online: WAI Guidelines Address Older Users Web Experience * > - Agree, no changes needed as it is an article > - > *Instructions for the "Web Accessibility for Older Users" presentation: * > - Planning team agrees this should be held off until post launch > updates. We do NOT need to link to this presentation or have it listed. > This needs to be noted so that we can take it back up post launch and do > any updates and add it back in later. > - > *Overview of Literature Review: * > - Planning team would like to keep this resource linked. There > needs to be an indication on the lit review page that it is currently not > being updated so that people will know. But we want to provide the > information all the same. This is another area that should be noted when > you are finished that future updates may be needed or the review removed. > For now, please keep and work it into the resource. > - *How WCAG 2.0 Applies* > - We believe this resource may have been overlooked in your initial > review as we don't see notes about it. It is linked in the side navigation > as a sub resource. > - URL: https://www.w3.org/WAI/older-users/developing > - Title: Developing Websites for Older People: How Web Content > Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Applies > - Please be sure to work this document into the edits as well and > let us know if you feel major changes need to be made to it. > - *A note that was in another email from Shawn* (Just wanted to add it > here too) > - In: https://www.w3.org/WAI/older-users/ we can delete: "(This > page was developed as part of the WAI-AGE Project, introduced below..)" at > the top - the whole WAI-AGE Project section at the bottom. The > acknowledgment should stay in the footer. > > > With this feedback integrated in you plan, it is approved and you are good > to go. Please keep up the great work as you go through the edits and work > with your review team to get to a final draft. Remember, if you have any > questions at all, please reach out to me right away and I will get you what > you need to keep moving forward. > > Please let us know if you have any questions about what we have added. > Happy to provide more detail if needed. > > Thanks, > Brent (& Planning Team) > > > > Brent A. Bakken > Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services > Pearson > > 512 202 1087 > brent.bakken@pearson.com > > Learn more at pearson.com > > [image: Pearson] > > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Victoria Menezes Miller < > menezesmiller@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear EO Planning group, >> >> (I'm sending this mail to Shawn, Sharron and Brent, as I'm currently in >> transit in airports and cannot recall the generic e-mail to whom the >> message should be addressed. Would appreciate your forwarding as required). >> >> Our apologies for the slight delay due to some mails not reaching one >> another. >> >> Charlotte and I have looked at the "Older Users Resources", have examined >> the four resources mentioned below and submit our comments hereafter: >> >> *Web Accessibility and Older People: Meeting the Needs of Ageing Web >> Users* >> This resource needed the most reworking. Attached in track-change mode >> one version, plus a clean version for comparison. The link to the current >> resource is: https://www.w3.org/WAI/older-users/#dev >> We have tried to tailor it to remove the technical focus currently at the >> beginning (with the listing of the Guidelines) and placing those links at >> applicable points addressing the user groups in question. We have tried to >> eliminate as much of the extra words as possible. Attached two files, one >> in track-change mode, one clean version. >> >> *Older Users Online: WAI Guidelines Address Older Users Web Experience* >> No changes to as it is a reproduced article >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/posts/2009/older-users-online >> >> *Instructions for the "Web Accessibility for Older Users" presentation:* >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/ageing/ >> The problem is whether this resource should be updated or not. >> The slides date back to 2010 and are a *WAI/AGE* project resource. >> >> - If there is the possibility to have these updated in the future, >> then, we would recommend removing them until such time that they are >> updated. The slides in question which might need updating are the >> statistics. Otherwise, I think the content is still relevant. >> >> *Overview of Literature Review*: >> The same problem as mentioned above as regards the updating of the >> WAI/AGE resource. >> Current web version link: https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/ >> wai-age-literature.php >> >> - The key question is will this resource(Literature Review) be >> updated in the future or not? If the resource will not be updated, then, a >> few suggestions are made in the attached Word file concerning the >> introductory page >> - Charlotte is concerned about old material being made available >> under the new design. She recommends that the *both *resources >> (presentation and overview of literature review plus review) be removed >> unless the literature review will be updated in the near future. >> >> Best, >> >> Vicki >> > >
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 20:54:16 UTC