W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-eo-plan@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: Tutorials was: Re: Which document to attack next?

From: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:46:25 +0200
To: "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
Cc: "Sharron Rush" <srush@knowbility.org>, public-eo-plan@w3.org
Message-ID: <218910A1-B54F-446A-99EA-945BE9739F3A@w3.org>


On 14 Sep 2017, at 0:58, Bakken, Brent wrote:

> Sharron steered Nic away from that. She gave him a different list to work
> on.
> Leaving all Tutorials as extremely low priority (the ones you tersified,
> not at all)

Thanks for clarifying.

Eric

>
>
>
> Brent A. Bakken
> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
> Pearson
>
> 512 202 1087
> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>
> Learn more at pearson.com
>
> [image: Pearson]
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 13. Sep 2017, at 23:52, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Then until we check with Shawn for other updates she has completed, the
>> next ones are lower priority (only do when Nic has no other to attend to),
>> they are the tutorials (lines 14-19)
>>
>> Uhm, are we also re-doing the Tutorials? At least the three that launched
>> recently have been tersified by me. (Remember the process of getting
>> consensus for the changes? :-))
>>
>> The others can take some massaging, but I wonder if it would be
>> better/easier if I did it? (There are also several changes pending.)
>>
>> Just curious.
>>
>> Eric
>>
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 08:46:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 14 September 2017 08:46:37 UTC