RE: Course List Requirements Review

Hello Letícia,
Thank you, I am fine with your replies and what you have decided to do following my questions.
Best
Sylvie

--
[Access42]
Sylvie DUCHATEAU
Experte accessibilité numérique
09 72 45 06 14 - 06 62 33 68 12
Expertise et formation en accessibilité numérique
access42.net<https://access42.net/> - Formations<https://formations.access42.net> - Newsletter<http://eepurl.com/dgHY2b>
Organisme de formation référencé au DataDock
et certifié Qualiopi<https://access42.net/certification-qualiopi-reconnaissance-qualite-formation-access42> pour sa démarche qualité

De : Letícia Seixas Pereira <lspereira@fc.ul.pt>
Envoyé : mardi 23 mars 2021 22:36
À : Sylvie Duchateau <sduchateau@access42.net>
Cc : Carlos Duarte <caduarte@campus.ul.pt>; public-eo-archive@w3.org
Objet : Course List Requirements Review

Dear Sylvie,

Thank you very much for your feedback on the survey on the Course List Requirements.
Carlos (in cc) and I went through your comments and made a few changes in the document in order to better address some of them.
We also have further remarks on a few topics that you have brought up:

Audience
1. The list looks good but I am not sure about the term "consumers". I can't find another word for now. May be: people dealing with accessibility. Professionals?
We decided to maintain the term "consumers" as it was largely discussed in the first meeting with EOWG. Furthermore, it goes with the concept of people who provide offers x people who consume those offers, highlighting the contrast of the audience.

Resources
2. The term "Dataset of the courses" is not clear to me, what is behind this? Otherwise I am fine with this list.
(Agreed) In order to clearly define the resource, we modified it to the term "Database containing the offers".


Let us know if you have any further comments or thoughts and thanks once again for your input.

Best,
Letícia Seixas Pereira