- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:09:23 -0500
- To: "sduchateau@access42.net" <sduchateau@access42.net>
- Cc: Carlos Duarte <caduarte@campus.ul.pt>, "public-eo-archive@w3.org" <public-eo-archive@w3.org>, Letícia Seixas Pereira <lspereira@fc.ul.pt>
Hi Sylvie, Here is a reminder that this is an internal EOWG "requirements analysis" - not intended for others outside of EOWG. At this time, I don't think there are plans to include the term "consumers" in the public deliverable. Hi Letícia and Carlos, Please keep in mind if later considering the term for the public deliverable, that we should get more feedback from Sylvie and others. Thanks for your comments and considerations! Best, ~Shawn On 23-Mar-21 4:36 PM, Letícia Seixas Pereira wrote: > Dear Sylvie, > > Thank you very much for your feedback on the survey on the Course List Requirements. > Carlos (in cc) and I went through your comments and made a few changes in the document in order to better address some of them. > We also have further remarks on a few topics that you have brought up: > > *Audience* > /1. //The list looks good but I am not sure about the term "consumers". I can't find another word for now. May be: people dealing with accessibility. Professionals? / > We decided to maintain the term “consumers” as it was largely discussed in the first meeting with EOWG. Furthermore, it goes with the concept of people who provide offers x people who consume those offers, highlighting the contrast of the audience. > > *Resources* > /2. //The term "Dataset of the courses" is not clear to me, what is behind this? Otherwise I am fine with this list./ > (*Agreed*) In order to clearly define the resource, we modified it to the term “Database containing the offers”. > > > Let us know if you have any further comments or thoughts and thanks once again for your input. > > Best, > Letícia Seixas Pereira >
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2021 23:09:32 UTC