- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:33:26 +0000
- To: Peter Krantz <peter@peterkrantz.se>
- CC: euopendata@lists.okfn.org, public-egov-ig <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Hi Peter, You've kicked off a lot of discussion - did you get a satisfactory answer? I've been thinking about a closely related topic recently - what controlled vocabularies do people find most useful and how can we find out? In Europe, in some circles, we think of Eurovoc, or AgroVoc - which are fine but may be seen as very Euro-centric. Owen Ambur points (not unnaturally) to what he sees in the StratML world which, so far, is largely US-centric. The NACE codes - that describe company activity - are based on the UN's ISIC codes and it all gets turned into a country-specific set known as SIC codes here in UK. What on Earth is a data publisher to do? I don't think there is a single answer. Creating a global "everyone should use this central list of enumerated terms" list is the way forward. *However* it does seem entirely reasonable to me for a data consumer or service operator to say "this is the data I understand, please use controlled vocab lists A, B or C if you want me to understand you." And, in similar vain maybe, something like: "you're free to use any of skos:prefLabel, rdfs:label and dcterms:title but in *my* application I treat them all the same." WDYT? Phil. On 01/03/2013 09:32, Peter Krantz wrote: > Hi! > > Many countries are developing national portals with metadata about > open datasets from the public sector. To make datasets easier to find > and to lower the threshold for pan-european (or global) re-use it > would be great if classification of datasets followed a shared > taxonomy. > > There are many candidates that could be used, e.g. Eurovoc [1], NACE > [2]. I would be grateful for any pointers if there is work going on to > harmonize classification of datasets on a global or European level. > > Regards, > > Peter Krantz > http://www.peterkrantz.com > @peterkz_swe > > [1]: http://eurovoc.europa.eu/ - availabble as LOD > [2]: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/index/nace_all.html > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 16:33:59 UTC