- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:16:43 +0800
- To: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Cc: "public-egov-ig@w3.org" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Sqkk119Qvm=kvFgZYwYJ+nXHqQJ2RwByhG1QvKYMVNJAw@mail.gmail.com>
Gannon thank you, very nice usable interface for this datasets if posible/relevat Please explain to the laypeople where is RDF/semantic capability in this data, and what functionality is delivered that would not be delivered by storing the data in any old database or file system P On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com> wrote: > It seems we became a Community just in time to avoid being people > interested in the inner workings of government. Thanks W3C. Now, if we can > just manage to avoid displaying any form of "Intelligence" ... > > The Semantic Web bears more than a little responsibility for that parsing > of "Intelligence Community" by suggesting that meta data is immortal and > expansive. Versions of applications give this impression, but the truth is, > for most data supplied by governments, the data base has changed very > little from last year's version. > > Coverage for an app is not the same thing as "full" coverage of a name > space because meta data does not disappear from the data base and > automatically reinsert itself at a later time. Yes it does, the Semantic > Web said so ... no it didn't, and it doesn't. > > This data base (downloadable) doesn't argue that silly point. I hope it > helps. Comments welcome. > > http://www.rustprivacy.org/faca/view/ > > --Gannon > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 14:17:14 UTC