Re: ping.

Hi Daniel,

FWIW, I just posted some details about the coordinate system I'm using [2].  It specifically addresses the question of separation of Commerce (and the "business" of Government) from the Open Data/Public Domain (and Governance).  It treats RDF/XML as a "coordinate system".  Turtle, etc. are easier [1].  I think this scheme would work well with Brand Nieman's "Transformative Government", literally - this is the math of the transforms. 

I suppose I should get in touch with okfn.  It's all cc-by SA but in MIT's case I could make an exception and sell it to them.  Shhhhh :)

--Gannon

[1] http://www.rustprivacy.org/2011/phase/ditl-UTC.pdf
[2] http://www.rustprivacy.org/2011/phase/www-cbp-12.xml
    http://www.rustprivacy.org/2011/phase/sol-www.html


--- On Fri, 1/21/11, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: ping.
> To: daniel@citizencontact.com
> Cc: "W3C eGov IG" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
> Date: Friday, January 21, 2011, 11:39 AM
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:16 -0500, daniel@citizencontact.com
> wrote:
> > Is there any more conversation about next steps,
> meetings, etc?
> > Daniel
> 
> I'm not sure who you are asking.   Are you
> asking if people have more
> comments, or if there's been some discussion off-list?
> 
> Procedurally, we're interested in public comment on the two
> draft
> charters, but not hearing a lot....
> 
>  * http://www.w3.org/2011/govdata/charter
> 
> I expect this one to move forward shortly.
> 
>  * http://www.w3.org/egov/IG/charter-2011
> 
> On this one, the IG, there's definitely space for someone
> to step up to
> a leadership role, mobilizing the community.
> 
> On government data in general, I personally have been
> somewhat
> following discussions in two other (non-W3C) places:
>    http://web.mit.edu/govdata
> and
>    http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
> 
> 
>      - Sandro
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 21:07:40 UTC