Re: Recommending publishing data as JSON [in: Publishing Open Government Data]

Same here at CTIC various Open Data projects in Spain. I don't see any problem with adding JSON. Probably the only issue is that the document dates already back to more than a year ago, it's still a WD in progress (so to say since we didn't update it at all since then) and needs a review, an update and to be published as a Group Note. As usual, we would need IG volunteers to do so.

-- Josema


El 26/11/2010, a las 04:16, Jim Hendler escribió:
> In fact, Data.gov also does this through the linked data stuff hosted at RPI - we use various combinations of JSON, HTML and straight RDF in the various mashups,
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 25, 2010, at 22:09, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au> wrote:
>>> True - should get a mention. Open standard too so no issues there. Example use case would be good too.
>> 
>> I agree. JSON is another good example of a widely deployed web
>> standard for data (RFC 4627) that really ought to be discussed in the
>> context of best practices for web access to egov data. Some of the
>> folks involved in data.gov.uk effort have worked specifically on using
>> JSON to provide more familiar access to pools of RDF made available at
>> SPARQL endpoints [1].
>> 
>> """
>> For some web developers the need to understand the RDF data model and
>> associated serializations and query language (SPARQL) has proved a
>> barrier to adoption of linked data. This project seeks to develop
>> APIs, data formats and supporting tools to overcome this barrier.
>> Including, but not limited to, accessing linked data via a
>> developer-friendly JSON format.
>> """
>> 
>> //Ed
>> 
>> [1] http://purl.org/linked-data/api/project
>> 
> 

Received on Friday, 26 November 2010 07:38:19 UTC