- From: Cory Casanave <cory-c@modeldriven.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:50:38 -0400
- To: "Michael Hausenblas" <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, "Gannon Dick" <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Cc: <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Given a linked data URI, how do I find the VoiD resource that describes it? -----Original Message----- From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hausenblas Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 6:28 PM To: Gannon Dick Cc: public-egov-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Linked Data Gannon, Not sure I totally understand the issue you seem to raise, but if I understand you correctly the solution is simple: voiD (vocabulary of interlinked datasets) [1]-[4]. Cheers, Michael [1] http://semanticweb.org/wiki/VoiD [2] http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide [3] http://rdfs.org/ns/void [4] http://sw-app.org/pub/ldow09-void.pdf -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com> > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:05:28 -0700 (PDT) > To: <public-egov-ig@w3.org> > Subject: Linked Data > Resent-From: <public-egov-ig@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:06:04 +0000 > > CC wrote: > On the demo call today we discussed a couple of technical issues that > impact but are not specific to government. These are: > > 1) That given a data URI, there is no standard way to > programmatically access the metadata about the resource. > > Sandro wrote: (can't find the exact quote) > -The RDF model is the only one we (the W3C) have.- > > I also looked at the DERI.ORG sitemap extensions. The explanations were well > worth the read. The potential problem I see with extending sitemap is that it > disconnects linked data from it's RDF and (Collection of) Human Readable HTML > parts - 1 site=1 Database - and if you had more than one <owl:Thing> to share > it could get very complicated. Therein lies the rub. > > For reasons stated here: > http://www.rustprivacy.org/2010/meta/linked-data.pdf > with an example here: > http://www.rustprivacy.org/2010/meta/linked-data.xml > or for the bold: > http://www.rustprivacy.org/2010/meta/linked-data.xsl (on valid XHTML) > > I think the complexity is in the nature of meta data and not in the sitemap > mechanism. However, I could really, really really use some feedback from the > W3C and deri.org. > > --Gannon > > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 22:51:04 UTC