- From: Josh Tauberer <tauberer@govtrack.us>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:10:33 -0500
- To: Cory Casanave <cory-c@modeldriven.com>
- CC: public-egov-ig@w3.org
On 03/12/2010 09:21 AM, Cory Casanave wrote (in reverse order): > What are the existing or proposed > conventions and ontologies to satisfy these requirements? > > 1) That given a data URI, there is no standard way to programmatically > access the metadata about the resource. Obviously I wasn't on the call and don't know what was discussed, but some points- The Linked Data 'movement' started, as I recall, in the use of http: URIs as the convention for all RDF resources. By using http:, there's implicitly a web page that can be accessed for more information about that resource --- a page that can be in RDF format itself. > 2) That given a data URI there is no standard programmatic way to access > a SPARQL query point for that resource and/or for associated resources. See: http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/ - Josh Tauberer - CivicImpulse / GovTrack.us http://razor.occams.info | www.govtrack.us | civicimpulse.com "Members of both sides are reminded not to use guests of the House as props."
Received on Friday, 12 March 2010 15:11:03 UTC