RE: Group Note FPWD is done

Jose, I'd like to see this section rewritten:
http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/Group/docs/note#Semantics 

It is not necessary to agree upon the semantics in advance.  So long as the
definitions of the elements are documented, machine intelligence can be
applied to foster understanding of the differences.  It may also be possible
to infer the semantics of the elements based upon the kinds of data that
actually occur between the tags.

Owen 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Jose M. Alonso
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 5:09 AM
To: eGov IG
Subject: Group Note FPWD is done

All,

It has been a very intense weekend. Some of us, namely Kevin, John and  
me have been working until the very last minute on developing the  
final draft. We have worked on the document until yesterday night,  
then called it done.

Final document is a snapshot of the current Editor's Draft [1] and we  
are requesting publication on March 10; comments will be welcomed  
until April 26.

Thanks John, Oscar, Daniel and Owen for providing content for the  
document. Very special thanks to Kevin for bearing with me over the  
last couple days and a great editorial work.

I think the document is quite solid but no doubt that with the help of  
others it could be greatly improved, so do not hesitate to send  
comments or offering authoring help.

Cheers,
Jose.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/Group/docs/note

--
Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>    W3C/CTIC
eGovernment Lead                  http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/

Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 21:16:55 UTC