- From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:20:42 +0100
- To: richard.murphy@gsa.gov
- Cc: "John Sheridan" <John.Sheridan@nationalarchives.gov.uk>, "Kevin Novak" <kevinnovak@aia.org>, "eGov IG" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, public-egov-ig-request@w3.org, swick@w3.org
Hi Rick, Thanks much for the heads up and for sending the comments with which I agree. I think it'd be difficult for me personally to be involved with the process, but probably Kevin could do on behalf of the Group. You can email me/Chairs also privately with suggestions on what the requirements are to see if we have enough cycles to do so. Cheers, Jose. El 07/01/2009, a las 16:00, richard.murphy@gsa.gov escribió: > Jose & All: > > As you know, the U. S. Federal Reference Model Maintenance Process > (RMMP) is currently soliciting suggestions for revisions. > > The RMMP is community based and organized by Architecture and > Infrastructure Commitee (AIC) members on behalf of the Office of > Management and Budget (OMB). W3C CAN have a voice in this process > and I encourage W3C to engage actively in the RMMP. Among other > standards organizations, the Object Management Group (OMG) through > the leadership of Richard Soley has already successfully influenced > outcomes here. > > Specifically, the data reference model (DRM) influences much of the > thinking within Federal agencies regarding issues central to W3C > such as Uniform Resource Indicators (URIs). I've already suggested > changes to the DRM based on Use Case 8 & Use Case 10. Like other > political processes here in Washington, DC active participation by a > committed group of constituents is what makes the difference on > whether something gets approved. > > Best wishes, > > Rick > > office: 202-501-9199 > cell: 202-557-1604 > > > > "Jose M. Alonso" <josema@w3.org> > Sent by: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org > 01/07/2009 08:28 AM > > To > "eGov IG" <public-egov-ig@w3.org> > cc > "John Sheridan" <John.Sheridan@nationalarchives.gov.uk>, "Kevin > Novak" <kevinnovak@aia.org> > Subject > canceling call today -- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 7 Jan 2009 > > > > > > > All, > > /me has the flu; very low energy. Chairs cannot make it for the whole > call and we also got several other regrets. Looks like today's not the > day, so we are canceling the call today. > > Chairs will meet next week and next Group call should take place on 21 > Jan with probably same agenda as sent for today's. We'll keep you > posted. Very sorry about this. > > Please, keep on reviewing the draft note and sending use cases. > > -- Jose > > > El 07/01/2009, a las 13:58, Kjetil Kjernsmo escribió: > > On Monday 05 January 2009 16:55:19 Jose M. Alonso wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> New year, new Group call. Please find the agenda below. Since we > have > >> a few new subscribers, let me remind you that calls are intended > for > >> Group participants only (instructions at [1]), but if you'd like to > >> become one just take a look at [2]. > > > > Sorry, I have too many urgent tasks here now, so my regrets. > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > Kjetil Kjernsmo > > -- > > Senior Knowledge Engineer > > Mobile: +47 986 48 234 > > Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com > > Web: http://www.computas.com/ > > > > | SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE | > > > > Computas AS PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax: > > +47 6783 > > 1001 > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 12 January 2009 16:21:34 UTC