- From: Webb, KerryA <KerryA.Webb@act.gov.au>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:38:00 +1000
- To: <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6728FC12ECED9547862D3B4261FBCE000F28E7CB@cal067.act.gov.au>
One thing that many people (especially senior fellows in Institutions, Think Tanks, Consultancy Corporations etc) ignore is that in some countries there are at least three levels of government - national, state/province and city/county. So we continually see bogus league tables that show that country A is ahead of country B in e-government, based solely on an analysis of the "top" sites in country B's national government. The significant point is that the big gains in e-government in the three-level model are mostly at the state/province level because that's where they provide most services to the public. This is true to a lesser degree at the city/county level, not that they don't provide services but that their size and capacity for investment often limit their abilities. So you might find that my government (with a hybrid city/state form) has e-government developments that would compare favourably with some small countries, but of course that doesn't show up in the league tables. Which doesn't give us much confidence in the senior fellows. Kerry -- Kerry Webb Policy Office InTACT ACT Government, Canberra, Australia ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 06:50:46 UTC