- From: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen <hsteen@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:04:00 +0200
- To: Yoshifumi Inoue <yosin@google.com>
- Cc: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Yoshifumi Inoue <yosin@google.com> wrote: > Some developer's don't wont to get text-transform'ed result: > http://crbug.com/325231 Sure some do. Not pausing to consider that copying "source code case" will make sense only to developers and confuse everyone else.. Johannes's points are solid: when the context allows (as in rich text copying), we should include all the information that lets the paste target software process the text and make decisions, i.e. copy the HTML in "source code case" and include CSS doing the text-transform. I suppose nobody is opposed to that? The only remaining contentious part should be what to do for the plain text case - IMO having the "source code case" available as rich text makes it even more correct to let the plain text clipboard entry be as close as possible to what the user sees on the screen. -Hallvord R
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2016 11:04:58 UTC