- From: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:09:09 +0900
- To: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
- Cc: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABkgm-Tsa1_4=Z1F5Wy=gKaOKdXKcAofKz3-Uv6zr07ji5eZGw@mail.gmail.com>
Right, important stuff. But the shortcuts, etc. are not just text editing related, right? I could also have an image editor and hit CTRL+S on that. Or be ion the middle of a game and hit some such key to save my progress. If the members of this WG feel this is within the scope of this WG, I am not opposed to us taking this work on (although I will be a lot more quiet on that issue), but I think we should not mix it with the 1-2 specs we are currently creating so that we can get those out of the door right away. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote: > Yeah, fixing shortcut key will be awesome. I think enlarging the scope a > little and providing a generic mechanism to list available "commands" or > "actions" on a page or a widget on a page is also useful for accessibility > purposes because not everyone has access to keyboards or pointing devices. > > > On Oct 21, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Chaals McCathie Nevile < > chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I presume everyone does this. > > > > It's a terrible idea. We really should find a way to stop doing it. > > > > I think a key to being able to give them up is to make accesskey work. > For the moment implementations still range between bad and abysmal ;( > although the overall standard is way better than it was. > > > > If we don't do that, we're going to be stuck replicating it and hoping > we somehow do it different this time. If we do fix it, we have teh benefit > of not breaking a lot of existing content (last I checked, accesskey was > used by about 1.5% of content - and it tends to be on big sites people use > a lot). > > > > Note there are a few key things to keep in mind: > > > > accesskey shouldn't replace user intention events or other standard > things like <a rel="help">. If we have a standard event for "Toggle Bold > Text" or "make this a link" then it *shouldn't* need an activation, since > it should have one in the UI. (But then, following links in SVG should have > one too, and doesn't in a fair number of browsers ;( ). > > > > accesskey should be an author *hint* to activate an element (or > function), and the user agent should be free to assign some other > activation behaviour - a key that is more readily available (accesskey="я" > is perfectly sensible in some cases, but should be mapped for latin > keyboard users - and in Opera not directly to the Z key that it already > uses for enhanced navigation) > > > > users should be able to find out what shortcut activation has been > assigned, from the user agent. Asking authors to guess is stupid at best > because they don't get it right, and impossible at worst because if you > allow for customisation the odds of them getting it right are probably even > smaller. > > > > One of these days - maybe even in time for TPAC - I hope to get my > accesskey proposal finished. It's currently a mess on github... > > > > cheers > > > > -- > > Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex > > chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > > > > > -- Johannes Wilm Fidus Writer http://www.fiduswriter.org
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2015 04:09:39 UTC