- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:25:04 +0200
- To: public-editing-tf <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "Koji Ishii" <kojiishi@gmail.com>
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:44:52 +0200, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > I merely remember, if I'm not mistaken, there were some discussions > that we don't want to make "decisions" at F2F, because this TF has > several Invited Experts and not all can make every F2F. > > I liked that, but I don't think we have discussed how then we would > make "decisions". > > Can we discuss and set our process for what is, say, consensus for > this TF, how to build it, what kind of things would need WG > resolutions, and so forth? We're part of the Web Platform working group, and the formal decision policy is written in the charter: <http://www.w3.org/2015/10/webplatform-charter.html#decisions> That points to the Work Mode documents, which you should read: <https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/WorkMode.md> (That document can be changed if the Group makes a decision to do so :) ). Things that need WG resolutions are "the things we don't just happily agree on" - the goal is that we create obvious consensus as we go… but of course it doesn't always work out like that. We can make decisions by either 1. Call for Consensus - send an email, giving a week or so, and asking for a "yes/no" answer on a particular question. 2. To make a decision in a meeting we record it as a Resolution, and send the minutes to the Web Platform admin list. People have 10 days to object - e.g. if they weren't at the meeting, and if they don't, it is a decision. In general these should be technical decisions. Background philosophy, like "should we only allow people to type Cyrillic" or "should we determine error-handling for everything" is legitimate for debate, but formal decisions should be on things where this meets testable reality, like "if someone tries to type Cyrillic, throw" or "error X must be dealt with in the following way…" Does that give enough of a framework? Do you think we need more formality within the TF? cheers Chaals (I'm one of the chairs of the WG, so more formally, decisions are what I and my co-chairs announce they are, subject to the constraints from our charter and the process as noted above). -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 10:25:41 UTC