- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 02:09:28 +0900
- To: Johannes Wilm <johanneswilm@gmail.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Piotr Koszuliński <p.koszulinski@cksource.com>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@chromium.org>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Johannes Wilm <johanneswilm@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, > this wasn't meant as restarting this debate. It was merely meant as an > explanatory note why I think dealing with IME this way is consistent with > everything else we do. IIUC your "everything else" is cut & copy etc., not hardware keyboard, correct? As I replied to Florian, it looks inconsistent to me. Continuing discussion on ML is also fine with me, I may not be able to respond to all of them, and probably we will not be able to reach consensus on ML, but it might help discussions at Sapporo. > At this stage I think if we start out from scratch, we risk killing the tf > altogether and live another fifteen years with what we have. If there are > strong views that IME cannot be dealt with correctly without a few years of > discussion on IMEs, we may just need to remove IME from version 1.0 entirely > and instead put it into the next version. The old cE doesn't go away from > browsers, so it's not like we take anything away from anyone. Proposal is fine, it's everyone's right. Can you get WG resolutions if you want to remove IME? /koji
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:10:15 UTC