Re: [bikeshed] Editing repo name [Was: Re: existing contenteditable spec]

Lets rename the "editing-explainer" repository "editing". Xiaoqian and I
have investigated this quite a lot and found out how to do redirect without
losing any redirects. Noone has objected to renaming and that name is just
a lot clearer. The other repository can be closed.
On May 28, 2015 12:24 PM, "Xiaoqian Wu" <xiaoqian@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Any conclusion on this thread? Shall we keep the existing
> "editing-explainer" & "editing-apis"? or any other proposals?
>
> --
> xiaoqian
>
> > On 2015-5-26, at 8:19pm, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/22/15 11:03 AM, Johannes Wilm wrote:
> >> PS: I don't quite understand why the repo is called "editing-explainer".
> >
> > I believe the name was chosen because Ben originally focused on use
> cases and explaining the general problem space.
> >
> >> It seems to mena that "editing-task-force" or "editing-apis" would be
> more useful names.
> >
> > I don't have a strong preference on the repo name and I can live with
> the existing name, although I agree "editing-apis" (or just "editing")
> would be a better description.
> >
> > -ArtB
> >
> >
> >
>
>