- From: Xiaoqian Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 00:23:51 +0800
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>
Hi all, Any conclusion on this thread? Shall we keep the existing "editing-explainer” & "editing-apis”? or any other proposals? — xiaoqian > On 2015-5-26, at 8:19pm, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/22/15 11:03 AM, Johannes Wilm wrote: >> PS: I don't quite understand why the repo is called "editing-explainer". > > I believe the name was chosen because Ben originally focused on use cases and explaining the general problem space. > >> It seems to mena that "editing-task-force" or "editing-apis" would be more useful names. > > I don't have a strong preference on the repo name and I can live with the existing name, although I agree "editing-apis" (or just "editing") would be a better description. > > -ArtB > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2015 16:24:05 UTC