- From: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 07:39:14 +0200
- To: Chaals from Yandex <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, Frederico Knabben <f.knabben@cksource.com>, Piotr Koszuliński <p.koszulinski@cksource.com>, daniel <daniel@fiduswriter.com>, Takuto Kojima <mail@takutokojima.com>
- Message-ID: <CABkgm-T1p1s5K+RP9t-pOe7TxSwCWGn+iS8eJ8g+fKxvHN04dg@mail.gmail.com>
Hey, yes, I would like to edit the http://w3c.github.io/editing-explainer/contentEditable.html document which, I guess, we are to define the behavior of contenteditable=typing . In particular I would like to add sections on caret movement and some of the issues that already have been resolved through discussions on github and on this list. Unfortunately I will not be in the US this week. Meetings in Europe would be very helpful, especially because so many f us are in Europe. On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:00 AM, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > > 06.04.2015, 00:20, "Johannes Wilm" <johannes@fiduswriter.org>: > > I am an invited expert in this group and I'd be willing to be one of > several editors of this spec, but I don't think I'd have enough time to do > it all by myself as I already am the editor of a spec in the CSSWG. > > > Fair enough. > > > Also, I would think it would be important to have one, preferably several > representatives from the browser makers among the spec editors, so chances > are slightly higher that it will actually find its way into browsers > eventually. > > > True. Although given that the web relies on you guys for decent editors to > a large extent, I think it's easier than you think to get traction. > > > If Microsoft just replaces Ben with someone else as the only editor, I'd > also support that. > > > My impression is that they are looking for someone appropriate - i.e. they > don't want to control all this through the editor (after all, they can do > that with participation and being microsoft ;) ) but that they want this > stuff to happen. If you would *like* to edit (or anyone else on the thread > would) I'll check explicitly with Adrian Bateman at MS, who's the key guy > for the discussion... > > thanks for keeping our noses to the grindstone. I actually think this work > is *really* important and want it to keep moving. > > I don't suppose anyone will be in Seattle next week for the HTML meeting, > or in the bay area the week after for any of a series of things that are > happening then? > > And while I am here, would it be helpful to have a european host for a > meeting of this task force? I might be able to organise something in > Berlin, London, Madrid, ... > > cheers > > chaals > > > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:22 PM, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > We're expecting Microsoft to provide an alternative editor - although if > anyone else would like to do it and is part of webapps working group, feel > free to volunteer... > > cheers > > 05.04.2015, 12:19, "Johannes Wilm" <johannes@fiduswriter.org>: > > Hey, I noticed that the contenteditable spec hasn't been updated since > February and it appears Ben's Microsoft email is not working any more. > Searching the internet it appears he is now working for Amazon. Is anyone > currently maintaining the spec? > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > > > > > -- > Johannes Wilm > Fidus Writer > http://www.fiduswriter.org > > > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > > -- Johannes Wilm Fidus Writer http://www.fiduswriter.org
Received on Monday, 6 April 2015 05:39:42 UTC