- From: Daniel Garijo via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:34:40 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Thanks for your answers. Yes, we will create a separate class in our profile. The discussion stems from our class not being a dcat:Dataset but a dcat:Resource with a dcat:distribution. According to that, it would make our new class a dcat:Dataset, hence the request to generalize dcat:distribution with domain dcat:Resource instead of dcat:Dataset. What I meant by making our profile an implicit extension is a little of a hack I proposed to our group to make everyone happy: We don't extend dcat:Dataset, extending instead dcat:Resource, but we still use dcat:distribution. Then if you infer triples this would make our extension a type of dcat:Dataset, but only if you apply inference. Does that make it clear? -- GitHub Notification of comment by dgarijo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1576#issuecomment-1658106487 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 31 July 2023 10:34:42 UTC