- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:19:09 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
But also the scope statement says that `dcat:Resource` is a "parent class" that is not "intended to be used directly". So it would make sense, if you deem your resources to be sufficiently different from datasets, to define a new subclass of `dcat:Resource`. What I do not fully understand is that @dgarijo says that you want to "make our profile an implicit extension of Dataset without explicitly asserting it". This seems to say that your resources are not enormously different from datasets but just a variation. In that case, I wonder if declaring it as a separate class makes things more confusing? -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1576#issuecomment-1658085146 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 31 July 2023 10:19:11 UTC