- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:02:10 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@iherman in my experience, many RDF implementations (libraries, triple stores, inference engines) support xsd:decimal. So yes, replacing it with dcat:decimal might disrupt some systems... More problematic: normatively, OWL2 only supports a predefine set of datatypes (including xsd:decimal). Any other datatype is, by default, rejected by reasoners (although Hermit has an option to simply ignore them). So this would be a daring step. But I believe it would solve problems in the long term. @gkellogg I agree that sticking to strings (with value objects or type coercion) is the easy way out in JSON-LD. But can we really convince people to give up on number in JSON? This kinds of contradict our narrative that "JSON-LD can still be used as day-to-day JSON" if we add "... expect for this or that kind of JSON". -- GitHub Notification of comment by pchampin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1536#issuecomment-1286736382 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 10:02:11 UTC