- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 12:57:13 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@kvistgaard I am not sure the discussion should continue. DCMI has agreed to drop the problematic range for `dcterms:type`. This was in fact in line with what DCMI wanted to do anyway, it's just that there was an oversight in the previous update. Indeed having `rdfs:Class` as range is not helpful, even more the perspective of the 'more modern' `dcterms:` namespace. Maybe this was not the original intent of your intervention, but trust me this is actually quite a great outcome, thank you again (with my hat of DCMI Usage Board member) :-) -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1362#issuecomment-855395165 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 6 June 2021 12:57:36 UTC