- From: Ivo Velitchkov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 03:57:12 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@tombaker why not using `dc:type` instead, where there is no range? This way DCAT will be compatible with DC, while it won't be the case with DC Terms, when using `dcterms:type`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kvistgaard Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1362#issuecomment-851786300 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2021 03:57:33 UTC