- From: Stephen Richard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 16:57:38 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I agree. In ISO 19119 terms, there are services that are 'tightly coupled' to a dataset, and I'd argue are essentially distributions of that data, and services that provide functionality that can work with many datasets, as long as they are accessible via the API&interchange format that the service understands. Services in this second category should be described as services, and specify the interface/interchange format(s) they use. Services of the first type are more usefully documented in a dataset catalog as distributions of a dataset. -- GitHub Notification of comment by smrgeoinfo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1431#issuecomment-988994055 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2021 16:57:39 UTC