- From: Annette Greiner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:37:53 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Thanks, Alejandra. I think we need to do more than just recommending. With this clarification, owl:versionInfo seems like a reasonable choice. I think what people are hoping for is an agreement to use one particular term as part of DCAT, not just a statement that there are many options and we like one of them. -Annette > On Nov 18, 2020, at 2:32 PM, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > > Related to pav:version <https://pav-ontology.github.io/pav/#d4e869>, we should consider that PAV <https://pav-ontology.github.io/pav/> (the Provenance, Authoring and Versioning vocabulary) is not a W3C recommendation. > > The notes on owl:versionInfo <https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#versionInfo-def> indicate that "Although this property is typically used to make statements about ontologies, it may be applied to any OWL construct. For example, one could attach a owl:versionInfo statement to an OWL class. ". So, it seems a suitable existing property to cover the use case. > > @agreiner <https://github.com/agreiner> said: > > Failing to adopt any specific term seems like failing to address this use case. > > Do you think that adopting owl:versionInfo is not appropriate for addressing the use? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1280#issuecomment-729999219>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGVLNZC7NIA5YIZUI2CE4TSQRDQRANCNFSM4TVMY6RQ>. > -- GitHub Notification of comment by agreiner Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1280#issuecomment-730001674 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2020 22:37:55 UTC