Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)

Related to [```pav:version```](, we should consider that [PAV]( (the Provenance, Authoring and Versioning vocabulary) is not a W3C recommendation.

The notes on [```owl:versionInfo```]( indicate that <em>"Although this property is typically used to make statements about ontologies, it may be applied to any OWL construct. For example, one could attach a owl:versionInfo statement to an OWL class. "</em>. So, it seems a suitable existing property to cover the use case. 

@agreiner said:
> Failing to adopt any specific term seems like failing to address this use case. 

Do you think that adopting ```owl:versionInfo``` is not appropriate for addressing the use?

GitHub Notification of comment by agbeltran
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2020 22:32:29 UTC