- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 16:51:08 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@riccardoAlbertoni said: > Another possible candidate property to consider is [adms:status](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/#adms_status). > The property [adms:status](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/#adms_status) links the status of the Asset or Asset Distribution in the context of a particular workflow process. > > No domain is specified for this property, so the property can be applied to entities without inferring that they are adms:Asset(s). the range is skos:Concept. > > AFAIU, ADMS does not define a built-in codelist for status, so the conceptual schema can be chosen by adopters. I agree that `adms:status` can be used for this purpose. Actually, this is the property DCAT-AP has been using so far on `dcat:CatalogRecord` and `dcat:Distribution` - see: - https://github.com/SEMICeu/DCAT-AP/blob/master/releases/2.0.0/dcat-ap_2.0.0.rdf#L590 - https://github.com/SEMICeu/DCAT-AP/blob/master/releases/2.0.0/dcat-ap_2.0.0.rdf#L1146 The original version of ADMS also defined a set of code lists - including one for "statuses", which is the one used by DCAT-AP. RDF definition: http://purl.org/adms/status/ The possible values are: - completed - deprecated - under development - withdrawn These code list has not been included in the W3C ADMS specification, but it is however used in one of the examples in Section 4 (https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/#example-1). Quoting: ````turtle 1 :Fruit_02 a adms:Asset ; 2 dcterms:created "1999-05-24" ; 3 dcterms:description "Fruits that are found to be generally liked by most people." ; 4 dcterms:publisher <http://example.com/data#org> ; 5 dcterms:title "Fruit I like"@en ; 6 adms:status <http://purl.org/adms/status/Completed> ; 7 dcterms:type <http://purl.org/adms/assettype/CodeList> ; 8 adms:previous :Fruit_01 ; 9 adms:last :Fruit ; 10 dcat:distribution :Fruit_02.csv ; 11 dcat:distribution :Fruit_02.xml . ```` -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1238#issuecomment-633650549 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 25 May 2020 16:51:13 UTC