- From: pedro winstley <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:53:56 +0100
- To: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABUZhHktR9tf5yFMcisUpAVuTrGs1u58AF1YDnKjjrf1m9TjDQ@mail.gmail.com>
I think that this is something that can be illustrated in a primer, some of the options and how DCAT might be used together with prov, pav, or similar On Thu, 7 May 2020, 17:27 Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub, <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > I think we are close to an agreement on this issue, as the following > sentence, already included in DCAT 2, shows that we apply versioning on > all the first-class entities (datasets, distribution, but in principle also > catalogs and data service) > > see section about [Versioning]( > https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#dataset-versions) > >Versioning can be applied to any of the first-class citizens DCAT > resources, including Catalogs, Datasets, Distributions. The notion of > versions is very much related to the community practices, data management > policy and the workflows in place. It is up to data providers to decide > when and why a new version should be released. For this reason, DCAT > refrains from providing definitions or rules about when changes in a > resource should turn in a new release of it. > > Some concerns were expressed on versioning for data services, in > particular, whether content or service changes should trigger a new > version for data Service, but I think this is up to the adopters to decide. > > I suggest adding the requirement mentioned by Andrea about the "resource > status" as a separate issue. Then if there are no objections, I think we > can close this GitHub issue. What do others think? > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/93#issuecomment-625359493 using your > GitHub account > >
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2020 21:54:27 UTC