- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 23:20:52 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Yes, I agree. My proposal above overreached by adding the code and software examples. Particularly as this definition - from Section 5.1 - is immediately preceded by the definition of `dcat:Resource` which is the general case. I'm wondering if/where we should elaborate the explanation that if you want to build a catalogue of something that is not a Dataset or a DataService, then you could create a sibling sub-class of `dcat:Resource` - e.g. software, samples, museum specimens ... Or should we just leave the specific examples implied by what is said in https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#Class:Resource and https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#dcat-scope -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1221#issuecomment-604736156 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2020 23:20:54 UTC