W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2020

Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)

From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:16:27 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-587600878-1582049786-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
For profiles, I'm dreading that splitting repos will not save us the pain of examining old (open) issues to port them in the new ones, just as if we would have to resolve them in the old one. 

So in the end we may just not save time with the split repo route, perhaps even spend more time, if we count all the discussion in the setting and populating the repo, as shown in the very discussion here. Plus we could lose the cross-group synergy that could be quite useful (especially for UCs).

That said reducing the noise could be good, even though the github hum has actually gone done quite a bit recently anyway.

So I guess I'm rather against the split in the end, but I really can live with it if it's the majority thinks it's more appropriate for their work.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1216#issuecomment-587600878 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2020 18:16:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:34 UTC