Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone

Hi!

I had added some of the issues labelled with 'feedback', but I agree to add
them all to the milestone and deal with those soon.

Thanks,

Alejandra



On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 13:36, <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> wrote:

> +1 from me.
>
>
> Andrea
>
>
> ----
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific Project Officer
> European Commission DG JRC
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
> *Sent:* 06 February 2020 14:30:10
> *To:* Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran
> *Cc:* Dataset Exchange Working Group
> *Subject:* Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone
>
> Thanks, Alejandra,
> I agree with the proposed plan. I think it is crucial to advance some of
> the requirements we delayed.
>
> However, due to the constraints of the standardization process, we
> postponed some issues labeled as feedback that I don't see yet in the
>  DCAT3 FPWD milestone. (see
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Afuture-work+label%3Adcat+-milestone%3A%22DCAT3+FPWD%22+label%3Afeedback
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=**B&q=is*3Aopen*is*3Aissue*label*3Afuture-work*label*3Adcat*-milestone*3A*22DCAT3*FPWD*22*label*3Afeedback__;4pyTJSslKyUrJSslJSslKyU!!DOxrgLBm!XtWQgNATd_NVKx0jBTFGhyJE8jpIh4L_n1TQn9D3sOmnphLYrtwB59A8REuG2_YabmJLZLo$>
> ).
>
> I think we should reconsider also these issues before publishing any new
> working draft.
>
> So, I suggest to include them in the milestone.
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Riccardo
>