Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone

+1 from me.


Andrea


----
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

________________________________
From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Sent: 06 February 2020 14:30:10
To: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran
Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group
Subject: Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone

Thanks, Alejandra,
I agree with the proposed plan. I think it is crucial to advance some of the requirements we delayed.

However, due to the constraints of the standardization process, we postponed some issues labeled as feedback that I don't see yet in the  DCAT3 FPWD milestone. (see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Afuture-work+label%3Adcat+-milestone%3A%22DCAT3+FPWD%22+label%3Afeedback<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=**B&q=is*3Aopen*is*3Aissue*label*3Afuture-work*label*3Adcat*-milestone*3A*22DCAT3*FPWD*22*label*3Afeedback__;4pyTJSslKyUrJSslJSslKyU!!DOxrgLBm!XtWQgNATd_NVKx0jBTFGhyJE8jpIh4L_n1TQn9D3sOmnphLYrtwB59A8REuG2_YabmJLZLo$> ).

I think we should reconsider also these issues before publishing any new working draft.

So, I suggest to include them in the milestone.
What do you think?

Cheers,
Riccardo