Re: [dxwg] Ambiguous relationship in Figure 1 (#687)

I have attempted to address all points raised here in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/687#issuecomment-533844506 in PR #1001 

You will see there that the commits deal with:

1. Figs 12 - 17 legends removal
2. inconsistent `dct:conformsTo` & "conforms to" (all moved to `dct:conformsTo`)
3. inconsistent `dct:format` & "conforms to" (all moved to `dct:format`)

...and one or two other typos.

As per @kcoyle's comment above: we shouldn't be using `dct:hasFormat` anywhere.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/687#issuecomment-533870644 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 22 September 2019 10:49:05 UTC