Comments on CONNEG

I have read the latest CONNEG draft and am prepared to vote in favor of
advancing to CR - nice work!  (And thank you Lars for your clarifications).

I see that PROFPWD is listed under B1 and assume this can be updated and
moved to B2 later. (Can someone please confirm?)

Tom (between flights)


Some fixable glitches:

Section 1
These narrower profiles constrains

4
demonstrations

5.4
so that profiles, (the comma)

6.2
may no be capable of dereferencing

6.3
representation of the requested resource represented conforming

7.1
An functional profile

Received on Thursday, 19 September 2019 10:18:11 UTC