- From: Jakub Klímek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:38:05 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@matthiaspalmer The problem with your solution is that temporal coverage is something a catalog user would like to search for. Therefore, it is a property of a dataset. In your case, you would have: ```turtle <#ds2008> a dcat:Dataset ; dct:title "Budget for 2018"@en ; dcat:distribution <#di1> . <#di1> a dcat:Distribution ; dcat:downloadURL <#downloadablefile1> . <#ds2009> a dcat:Dataset ; "Budget for 2019"@en dcat:distribution <#di2> . <#di2> a dcat:Distribution ; dcat:downloadURL <#downloadablefile2> . ``` Next, using DCAT2, you would have to implement a dataset relation grouping those 2, probably by introducing a third dataset representing the series and using https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#qualified-relationship. The unresolved issue here is that this relation is very common, but currently left to application profiles to be defined, and therefore will not be interoperable among DCAT2 catalogs. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/868#issuecomment-533007874 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2019 07:38:06 UTC