- From: Jakub Klímek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:38:05 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@matthiaspalmer The problem with your solution is that temporal coverage is something a catalog user would like to search for. Therefore, it is a property of a dataset. In your case, you would have:
```turtle
<#ds2008> a dcat:Dataset ;
dct:title "Budget for 2018"@en ;
dcat:distribution <#di1> .
<#di1> a dcat:Distribution ;
dcat:downloadURL <#downloadablefile1> .
<#ds2009> a dcat:Dataset ;
"Budget for 2019"@en
dcat:distribution <#di2> .
<#di2> a dcat:Distribution ;
dcat:downloadURL <#downloadablefile2> .
```
Next, using DCAT2, you would have to implement a dataset relation grouping those 2, probably by introducing a third dataset representing the series and using https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#qualified-relationship. The unresolved issue here is that this relation is very common, but currently left to application profiles to be defined, and therefore will not be interoperable among DCAT2 catalogs.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/868#issuecomment-533007874 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2019 07:38:06 UTC