- From: Sebastian Hellmann via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:57:41 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Ok, this works for us in a sense. We consider this a contentVariant by time, whereas versions would be tied to updates of the dataset. There are good reasons to use distributions here. So this is a `SHOULD` in terms of the standard. I guess DCAT 2 still doesn't tackle abstract dataset identity. I will check 6.7 more closely. Does DCAT 2 use SHACL for anything? -- GitHub Notification of comment by kurzum Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1085#issuecomment-532820417 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2019 18:57:42 UTC