- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:34:36 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@larsgsvensson yes this would be the clean way to name the spec, if we would want to avoid the ambiguity with the functional profiles. And I'm not sure what to do with "Content Negotiation implies data" yes in a way it's true that one would expect data rather than functional profiles. But on the other hand one could also expect "Content Negotiation by Profile" to be about some kind of "Content Profiles". Our "Data Profiles" are not "Content Profiles", though. So the reader will need a clear rendition of what "Profiles" are. And if one of the first parts she sees in the document is about profiles that are really not the ones being negotiated, this is not super helpful. NB: I shall re-iterate the problem with the editorial issues (esp. the hyperlinks) I've spotted [earlier](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1022#issuecomment-525468854). The problem between functional profiles and the title is big, but if the hyperlinks were not in, it would already be smaller! -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1022#issuecomment-531238990 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 13 September 2019 13:34:37 UTC