- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:57:03 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac - i think you mean the example - not the axiom? If so fine. I agree making profileOf have no specific relation semantics doesnt make sense and just entails "everything is a profile" which is clearly unhelpful - which is why we can focus on the specific case where profileOf is transitive and has a semantics as strong as "dct:conformsTo" - which is actually fairly loose. @agreiner - if base specifications disagree on something - then its up to a use community to define a loose enough notion of conformance these statements can be made - otherwise, irrespective of labelling, those resources do not conform to the modelled semantics of profileOf. If I wanted to state my car is a lemon it doesnt mean I have to redefine the "functional" notion of lemon in a fruit market. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/844#issuecomment-531049758 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2019 23:57:04 UTC