Re: [dxwg] Axiomitise transitivity of dct:conformsTo through isProfileOf relationships (#844)

@aisaac If "profileOf" must have as its subject a profile and as its object a profile, which I think is the case, then that should be stated clearly in the document. In the past there were statements like "X is a profileOf Dublin Core terms" which is not true if both subject and object must be profiles. The axiom does show that both subject and object are profiles, but the definition of "isProfileOf" is:

>The subject of 'is profile of' defines constraints on the object which playes the role of a base specification

So it talks about a base specification, which could be something that is not a profile.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/844#issuecomment-530274874 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 08:19:04 UTC