More feedback on the DXWG re-charter

Concerning the DCAT activity:

  1.  I would expect to see 'GitHub issue backlog' as one of the inputs to the DCAT work
  2.  I don't think we intend to generate a new UCR _document_ (though new use-cases will be accepted at any time
  3.  I'm also a bit uncomfortable seeing 'DCAT3' listed explicitly - if we expect this to be leading into an evergreen standard it should be DCAT4, DCAT5, DCAT6 ...) - could it be reworded to indicate this?


Simon J D Cox
Research Scientist - Environmental Informatics<>
Team Leader - Environmental Information Infrastructure
CSIRO Land and Water<>

E<> T +61 3 9545 2365 M +61 403 302 672
   Mail: Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Vic 3169
   Visit: Central Reception, Research Way, Clayton, Vic 3168  ///honey.zebra.chip<>
   Deliver: Gate 3, Normanby Road, Clayton, Vic 3168<><><>
Twitter @dr_shorthair<>
CSIRO acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and we pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

The information contained in this email may be confidential or privileged. Any unauthorised use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
CSIRO Australia's National Science Agency  |<>

Received on Monday, 21 October 2019 20:42:13 UTC