- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:07:43 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair > http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadRole, http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#hadRole are not equivalent - they have different `rdfs:domain`. This is explained in the document. > > It is because PROV is fully activity-centric, so all relationships are via an activity. Yes, I was aware that dcat:hadRole is meant to be distinct from prov:hadRole, and that is why I was trying to figure out why OPSS is suggesting they should be the same. I worried that there were some flaws in the axiomatization of dcat:hadRole which might induce OPSS in suggesting the equivalence. I have noticed that If I change the name of dcat:hadRole the equivalence suggestion from OPSS disappears. I guess OPSS suggests the equivalence relying on the similarity between the name of properties. So it is not a matter of axiomatization flaws and we can simply ignore the suggestion from OPSS. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/924#issuecomment-491361609 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 10 May 2019 17:07:45 UTC