Re: [dxwg] dcat.ttl - editorialNotes (#920)

@davebrowning wrote:
>editorialNotes in dcat.ttl need reviewing/revising (as does the owl:versionInfo) to reflect the current state of the document.

The owl:versionInfo review you are suggesting reminds me that we might want to doublecheck dcat.ttl by using the [OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner (OPSS)]( 

There are different issues raised when applying OPSS on the current dcat.ttl, some perhaps are not so important but others might provide hints for improvements.
For example,  
- Results for P08: Missing annotations. 28 cases suggest the following elements have no rdfs:label defined: 

- we might want to doublecheck why results for P12: Equivalent properties not explicitly declared raise that the following properties could be defined as equivalent: 

- Results for P41: No license declared. 

GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2019 13:33:55 UTC