Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Editorial fixes (#919)


> Also should update scopeNote in dcat.ttl to match.

Which reminds me that the editorialNotes in dcat.ttl need reviewing/revising (as does the `owl:versionInfo`) to reflect the current status/where we've got agreement.  More I look more I see so I've opened #920 to track - probably not a good idea to include it in this PR.  

GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2019 07:44:40 UTC